Google was saved by antitrust, but now pulls up the ladder on startups (w Jeremy Stoppelman of Yelp) | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR
Jeremy Stoppelman, the founder of Yelp, discusses the early days of building Yelp and how Google's power influenced their success, and calls for anti-trust regulation to create equal opportunities for startups.
Key Insights
- 🌍 Yelp started in 2004, bringing consumer reviews to local businesses. It grew with the help of Google's support in sending users to their platform.
- 🔍 Google began viewing Yelp as a threat and started preferencing its own products over Yelp's in search results, affecting their visibility and success.
- 💼 Antitrust regulations have been a part of the US landscape since the early 1900s. However, there has been a lack of action in the past two decades.
- ⚖️ The Microsoft trial in 1998, which focused on browser preference, created an opportunity for Firefox to rise and for Google to gain distribution.
- 👥 Firefox started to gain too much success, leading Google to hire top developers to build their browser, Chrome, which was led by Sundar Pichai, the current CEO of Alphabet (Google's parent company).
- 🔒 Google's success benefited from antitrust actions against Microsoft but is now pulling up the ladder on startup opportunities by maintaining its dominance.
- 🗳️ Bipartisan support exists for two bills related to antitrust regulations: the American Innovation and Choice Online Act and the Open App Markets Act.
- 💪 Public support is important in getting these bills to the Senate floor and ensuring equal opportunities for startups. Contact Senator Chuck Schumer's office to voice your support for strong antitrust regulation.
Transcript
Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).
Questions & Answers
Q: How did Google initially support Yelp's growth in the early days?
Google supported Yelp by indexing their content and sending users to Yelp, creating a valuable partnership and exposing Yelp to a larger audience.
Q: What changes occurred in Google's behavior towards Yelp as they grew?
Google started viewing Yelp as a threat and began favoring their own products over Yelp's, pushing Yelp's content down and giving preference to Google's in-house offerings.
Q: What is Jeremy Stoppelman's stance on antitrust regulations?
Stoppelman believes that antitrust regulations are necessary to ensure startups have a fair opportunity to succeed and prevent big tech companies from impeding competition.
Q: What bills are currently in the Senate regarding antitrust regulations?
The two bills in question are s2992, the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, and s2710, the Open App Markets Act, both of which have bipartisan support and aim to regulate big tech companies and create a more level playing field for startups.
Q: What is the call to action in the video?
The viewers are encouraged to contact Senator Chuck Schumer's office and express support for strong antitrust regulations, as well as to use the provided link to send emails to their local congressional representatives in support of the legislation.
Answer:
Summary
This video discusses the power dynamics between small startups and big tech companies, using Yelp as a case study. It highlights how Google initially supported and partnered with Yelp, but eventually became a competitor and used its dominance to favor its own products. The video also delves into the history of antitrust regulation in the United States, particularly the Microsoft case, and how it influenced the rise of Google. It argues for the importance of strong antitrust regulation to promote a more open and competitive marketplace for startups.
Questions & Answers
Q: When did Yelp start and what was their initial idea?
Yelp started in 2004 with the idea of bringing consumer reviews to local businesses such as restaurants, dry cleaners, and plumbers. They wanted to encourage people to write reviews and create valuable content.
Q: How did Yelp initially benefit from partnering with Google?
Google had a message for entrepreneurs at that time, promising to send users to applications and websites with great content. Yelp took advantage of this by providing high-quality content with user reviews, which Google then indexed and directed more users to Yelp.
Q: Why did the partnership between Yelp and Google deteriorate?
Google started viewing Yelp as a threat and began prioritizing their own products in search results. They even pushed down Yelp's ranking and promoted their own property called Google Local (now Google Maps).
Q: How does Google's behavior resemble what they initially criticized Yahoo for?
In the past, Google mocked Yahoo for trying to trap users within its own ecosystem. However, Google now strives to keep users within its own platform, even if it means compromising the user experience.
Q: What is the historical context of antitrust regulation in the United States?
Antitrust regulation has been present in the US since Teddy Roosevelt's era, aiming to prevent market monopolization through anti-competitive conduct. However, there hasn't been much antitrust action in the past 20 years, with the Microsoft case being a significant exception.
Q: What was the Microsoft case about and how does it relate to Google's timing?
The Microsoft case focused on the preferential treatment of Internet Explorer over its competitor, Netscape. Interestingly, Google was born around the same time the US antitrust regulators recognized the harm of anti-competitive self-preferencing in software.
Q: How did the Microsoft case create an opportunity for Google?
Microsoft's forced changes in business practices opened up an opportunity for Firefox to rise from the ashes of Netscape. Google seized this chance by partnering with Firefox and gaining widespread distribution.
Q: What strategic move did Google make to counter Firefox's potential leverage?
Google became concerned about Firefox's increasing success and started hiring top developers from Firefox to create a clone called Chrome. Sundar Pichai, the current CEO of Alphabet (Google's parent company), played a significant role in running Chrome.
Q: Who benefits the most from antitrust action in the last 20 years, and what does this mean for startups?
Google is the major beneficiary of antitrust action in recent years. However, instead of fostering a more level playing field for startups, Google is now pulling up the ladder by creating barriers to entry. This limits entrepreneurial opportunities and stifles a diverse and competitive marketplace.
Q: What bills have been proposed to address the issue, and what can individuals do to support them?
Two bills have been proposed: the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (S2992) and the Open App Markets Act (S2710). These bills have bipartisan support, but they need to be voted on in the Senate. To support this legislation, individuals can contact Senator Chuck Schumer's office and express their desire for strong antitrust regulation.
Takeaways
The video emphasizes the need for robust antitrust regulation to prevent big tech companies from stifling competition and innovation. It argues that a diverse marketplace with numerous startups is beneficial for society. It calls upon individuals to support the proposed bills and to voice their support for strong antitrust regulation in order to create more opportunities for startups across the country.
Summary & Key Takeaways
-
Jeremy Stoppelman shares the early days of Yelp, starting in 2004, and how Google's support helped Yelp grow by indexing their content and sending users their way.
-
However, Google eventually viewed Yelp as a threat and started favoring their own products, leading to an uneven playing field.
-
Stoppelman discusses the need for antitrust regulations to prevent big tech companies from impeding the success of startups and calls for support for two bills currently in the Senate.
Share This Summary 📚
Explore More Summaries from Garry Tan 📚





