Justice with Michael Sandel - BBC: Justice: Collective responsibility | Summary and Q&A

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Summary

Germany today still bears the marks of its morally burdened history, including remnants of the Berlin Wall and Nazi architecture. The memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe serves as a reminder of the collective responsibility for the Holocaust. Taking responsibility for the sins of past generations is a powerful moral idea, but it is not clear if it can be justified according to Kant's philosophy. The question arises whether morality should be shaped by one's national identity, culture, and history. Aristotle's idea of citizenship and politics provides a more demanding approach that considers the good life.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why does Germany still bear the marks of its morally burdened history?

Germany still bears the marks of its morally burdened history because of the remnants of the Berlin Wall, the stark lines of Nazi architecture, and the public art memorial to the murdered Jews of Europe. These serve as reminders of the country's past atrocities.

Q: Why is there a collective responsibility for the Holocaust?

The Holocaust was not just committed by individuals but by an entire society. It was a collective crime. Therefore, there is a collective responsibility for the Holocaust, even for generations that did not commit the crimes themselves. This understanding helps Germany come to terms with the horror of the Holocaust.

Q: Did Kant believe in collective responsibility for the crimes of past generations?

Kant's philosophy does not explicitly address the issue of collective responsibility for the crimes of past generations. He believed that individuals are responsible only for the acts they freely choose, not for their country's past or the crimes of their grandparents. Kant's philosophy may not make sense of the idea of collective responsibility.

Q: Would Kant attribute any moral responsibility to inheriting something from previous generations?

Kant did not have a strong understanding of the psyche or psychological influences on morality. Although he would not have explicitly considered the inheritance of moral responsibility, he may have been against a generation taking responsibility from a previous one, as it would imply that the current generation is merely an instrument of the earlier one.

Q: What difficulties does Kant's insistence on stepping back from particular identities raise?

Kant's insistence on stepping back from particular identities and focusing on individual moral choice raises difficulties. It becomes challenging to reconcile obligations of solidarity and obligations bound up with the history of one's people and country. Kant prioritized individual choice and freedom over collective identity and historical context.

Q: Can justice be defined without considering the meaning of the good life?

The question arises whether justice can be defined without first figuring out the meaning of the good life. In debates about justice and politics, questions of virtue are often avoided to accommodate differing perspectives on the best way to live. However, this raises the issue of whether politics can truly be neutral on moral and spiritual questions.

Q: What was Aristotle's view on citizenship and politics?

Aristotle's view on citizenship and politics was more demanding than what is familiar today. He believed that politics was not just about maximizing GDP or protecting individual rights but about the good life. Aristotle's understanding of politics considered the well-being and flourishing of individuals within a society.

Q: When did Aristotle live, and what was the context of his teachings?

Aristotle lived and taught in Athens in the fourth century BC. Athens was an ancient Greek city-state known for its development of democracy, philosophy, and culture. Aristotle's teachings were influenced by the intellectual and cultural atmosphere of this time.

Q: How does Aristotle's approach to politics differ from modern perspectives?

Aristotle's approach to politics differs from modern perspectives in that he believed politics should be concerned with the good life rather than solely economic growth or individual rights. He emphasized the well-being and flourishing of individuals within a society, considering virtue and ethics as integral components of politics.

Q: Why is it important to consider Aristotle's perspective on citizenship and politics?

Considering Aristotle's perspective on citizenship and politics allows us to explore a more demanding approach that takes into account the good life and the broader ethical implications of political decisions. It challenges the idea that politics can be neutral on moral and spiritual questions and prompts deeper reflection on the meaning and purpose of society.

Takeaways

Germany's morally burdened history underscores the importance of collective responsibility for past atrocities such as the Holocaust. However, reconciling collective responsibility with Kant's philosophy presents challenges as he prioritized individual moral choice. Aristotle's view on politics offers a more demanding approach that emphasizes the good life and considers broader ethical implications. Reflecting on Aristotle's perspective can help us question whether politics can truly be neutral on moral and spiritual questions and encourage a deeper exploration of the meaning and purpose of society.