Bruno Latour | On Not Joining the Dots || Radcliffe Institute | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Bruno Latour argues for the need to re-evaluate traditional notions of globalism and nationalism in order to address the urgent challenges of the Anthropocene.

Transcript

[MUSIC PLAYING] - Good afternoon, everyone. I'm Liz Cohen. I'm Dean here at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, and I am delighted to welcome you all this afternoon to a lecture by renowned philosopher and anthropologist, Bruno Latour. At Radcliffe, we are dedicated to inquiry and investigation that transcends disciplinary boundaries, tackl... Read More

Key Insights

• 💢 There is a need to rethink traditional notions of sovereignty and globalism in the Anthropocene era.
• 🖐️ Cities and local communities can play a crucial role in forging new forms of sovereignty and developing ecological resilience.
• ⛔ The current national- and state-centric approach to governance is limited in its ability to address environmental challenges.
• ❓ Scale is not about size, but rather about complexity and interrelationships.

Questions & Answers

Q: What is the main issue that Bruno Latour addresses in his talk?

Bruno Latour explores the question of what the politics of the Anthropocene should look like, advocating for a reevaluation of traditional notions of globalism and nationalism.

Q: How does Latour suggest connecting the dots between land, Earth, globe, and Gaia?

Latour proposes the idea of a new form of sovereignty that goes beyond the nation-state and recognizes other territorialities of governance and political practice, such as the city.

Q: What role does Latour suggest cities could play in addressing environmental challenges?

Latour argues that cities have the potential to serve as sites of resilience and innovation, where new spatial designs and projects can be developed to confront ecological challenges. Cities also offer a platform for cross-national dialogue and can help bridge the gap between the local and the global.

Q: How does Latour view the current global governance arrangements?

Latour criticizes current global governance arrangements for their reliance on nation-states as the primary form of sovereignty. He suggests that such arrangements are limited in their ability to address environmental risks and that new forms of governance are needed.

Summary

This video is a lecture by philosopher and anthropologist Bruno Latour, discussing how to make sense of ourselves and our planet in the context of rapid climate change. Latour explores the concepts of the globe, the critical zone, and the Earth as different ways of understanding our relationship with the environment. He argues that traditional notions of globalism and nationalism are no longer applicable and proposes a third attractor, the Earth CZ, as a new way to orient ourselves politically.

Questions & Answers

Q: What is the main focus of Bruno Latour's lecture?

Bruno Latour's lecture focuses on how to make sense of ourselves and our planet in an age of rapid climate change.

Q: Who is Bruno Latour and why is he considered influential?

Bruno Latour is a renowned philosopher and anthropologist. He is considered influential because his work spans a wide range of disciplines, such as technology, the history of science, politics, and art history, and his writings have sparked important conversations.

Q: What is actor network theory and how has it impacted different fields?

Actor network theory, founded by Bruno Latour, argues that in order to understand larger systems, we must examine the relationships between multiple entities. This theory has left its mark on fields ranging from ancient history to public health, by highlighting the interactions between different people, plants, animals, objects, and places.

Q: How does Bruno Latour's work deepen our understanding of science?

Latour's studies of scientists and laboratories have deepened our insight into how science is practiced. He examines not just the data of scientific knowledge, but the social processes by which that data is understood by both scientists and laypeople.

Q: What is the critical zone and why is it important?

The critical zone is a thin layer of the Earth's surface that supports life. It encompasses everything from the top of the canopy to the deep rock below, and it is the subject of study for a group of scientists called the critical zone observatory network. Understanding the critical zone is crucial because it reveals the complex reactions and interactions that occur in the soil, weathering, and transformation of the Earth.

Q: How do artists contribute to our understanding of the climate crisis?

Artists can provide a unique perspective and sensitivity to the climate crisis. Their work helps us gain a greater awareness and appreciation for the impact of our actions on the environment and can help us question our assumptions and frameworks.

Q: Why is the notion of the globe problematic?

The notion of the globe is problematic because it leads to a loss of orientation. We are no longer sure how to navigate and understand our place in the world. Additionally, the idea of globalization can be contradictory, as it can refer to both embracing diversity and promoting a standardized, narrow definition of humanity.

Q: What is Gaia and how is it related to the critical zone?

Gaia, a term used by James Lovelock, refers to the Earth as a living organism that regulates itself to promote stability and create conditions favorable to life. The critical zone is a crucial component of Gaia, as it is the thin layer where life exists and interacts with its environment.

Q: How does the absence of clear boundaries impact politics?

The absence of clear boundaries, as seen in the context of the climate crisis, can lead to a sense of disorientation and a loss of confidence in traditional political frameworks. It becomes difficult to define issues and establish territories, which in turn affects the way political disputes are organized and understood.

Q: How does the third attractor, the Earth CZ, reorganize political orientation?

The Earth CZ, or critical zone, provides a new way to orient ourselves politically, reimagining our relationship with the environment. It moves away from traditional notions of globalism and nationalism, emphasizing overlapping entities and the complex interactions within the critical zone.

Takeaways

Bruno Latour's lecture shows that traditional ways of understanding our relationship with the environment, such as globalism and nationalism, may no longer be applicable in the face of the climate crisis. He argues for the need to reorient ourselves politically around the concept of the Earth CZ, or critical zone, which highlights the overlapping and interconnected nature of our world. This new perspective asks us to question our assumptions and frameworks and calls for a more nuanced and sensitive approach to the ecological challenges we face.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Bruno Latour challenges the idea of a globalized world, highlighting the need for new forms of governance and politics in the face of ecological crises.

• He argues for a reimagining of sovereignty and a move away from traditional nation-state-centric approaches.

• Latour suggests that cities and local communities could play a crucial role in forging new forms of sovereignty and developing ecological resilience.